ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Epilepsy concordance in monozygotic twins: the role of common genetic variants.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating rare and common variation in epilepsy genetics: from genetic architecture to penetrance and clinical expressivity.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Factors underlying discordance for epilepsy in monozygotic twins, in the absence of obvious acquired insults, are incompletely understood. Whilst subtle lesions and postzygotic mutations are sometimes observed, the contribution of common genetic variants remains unexplored. We investigated the role of these variants, measured by polygenic risk scores, in epilepsy concordance. We hypothesized that higher epilepsy polygenic risk scores in concordant monozygotic twins, compared to discordant monozygotic twins and controls, reflect increased epilepsy risk, raising the likelihood of both twins being affected. We calculated epilepsy polygenic risk scores for 102 monozygotic twin pairs (49 concordant, 53 discordant) and 14 632 controls using 2023 epilepsy genome-wide association study summary statistics. Logistic regression, adjusted for sex and principal ancestry components, showed that concordant pairs had significantly higher epilepsy polygenic risk scores than discordant pairs (mean 0.71 versus 0.18; Padj = 0.03) and controls (mean 0.71 versus 0; Padj = 0.001). In contrast, epilepsy polygenic risk scores in discordant pairs did not differ from controls (mean 0.18 versus 0; Padj = 0.38). Our findings suggest that concordance for epilepsy in monozygotic twins is partly driven by common genetic variant burden, underscoring the potential utility of epilepsy polygenic risk scores as predictive markers for epilepsy risk in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.