ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Global Positioning System-Derived Metrics and Machine Learning Models for Injury Prediction in Professional Rugby Union Players.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Model Development and Evaluation for Non-contact Lower Limb Injury Risk Prediction in Elite Male Rugby Union: A Multi-team, Multi-season Analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Athletes' performance and injury management in sports training using association rules and data mining techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Injury Prediction and Risk Modelling in Team Sports Using Artificial Intelligence and Sensor-Based Monitoring: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Machine learning prediction of ACL loading during the wide lunge: a multifactorial coupling analysis based on kinematic and electromyographic signals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Global Positioning System-Derived Metrics and Machine Learning Models for Injury Prediction in Professional Rugby Union Players.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sports, injury prevention is a key factor for success. Although injuries are challenging to predict, new technologies and the application of data science can provide valuable insights. This study aimed to predict injury risk among professional rugby union players using machine learning (ML) models. We analyzed data from 63 professional rugby union players during three seasons, categorized them into forwards and backs, and further classified them into five specific positions (tight five, back row, scrum-half, inside backs, outside backs). The dataset included GPS data and derived metrics such as total workload in the 1, 2, and 3 weeks prior to injury, acute-to-chronic workload ratio over different time windows, monotony, and strain. Injury prediction was assessed separately for different player positions using five ML classification models: logistic regression, naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine, random forest (RF), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). RF performed best for forwards overall, with XGBoost excelling in the tight five and SVM in the back row, whereas among backs, RF led for inside backs and NB for outside backs. Additionally, feature importance plots were used to examine the impact of various factors on injury occurrence. In conclusion, our ML-based approach can effectively predict injuries, with average F1 scores up to 0.66 (± 0.14), particularly when applying a combination of GPS-derived metrics. Additionally, key characteristics indicative of injury for players in various positions have been successfully identified. These findings underscored the potential of ML to enhance injury prediction and inform tailored training strategies for athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.