ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Directionality of Interpersonal Neural Influence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning: Feasibility of Information-Theoretic Causality Analysis in Motor Tasks.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-to-Brain Coupling Is Associated With the Benefits of Delayed Imitation in Skill Acquisition: An fNIRS Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Directionality of Interpersonal Neural Influence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning: Feasibility of Information-Theoretic Causality Analysis in Motor Tasks.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperscanning approaches mark a shift from single- to two-person neuroscience, enabling a more profound understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying interpersonal synchronization. In this context, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has emerged as a valuable tool for measuring brain activity in a natural, unconstrained environment. While interpersonal synchrony using fNIRS hyperscanning has been well-studied using statistical association analysis, establishing causal relationships that elucidate the direction of influence remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of determining the direction of influence in dyadic interactions. Since the ground truth of such direction is not available in a natural setting, we validated our approach in an experimental setup in which we controlled the direction of influence between two subjects by assigning them the roles of "Model" and "Imitator" of specified motor tasks. A total of 22 participants, hence 11 dyads, completed the task in a within-subject design. We adapted concepts from spectral causal effect decomposition theories to formulate a new measure of the direction and intensity of influence. The results demonstrate that the direction of influence in fNIRS data can be detected with an accuracy in the range of 62%-71%. Furthermore, the proposed spectral causality measure was shown to significantly reduce spurious causal relationships due to the confounding effects of physiological processes and measurement artifacts compared to time domain causal analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.