ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Experimental thinning reduces inter-ovary competition among and within inflorescences.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsResource availability often limits female reproductive success in plants, especially when multiple flowers within inflorescences compete simultaneously for limited resources. Here, I explore whether relaxation of inter-ovary competition (through experimental thinning of inflorescences and/or inflorescence buds) influences resource allocation and enhances reproductive output in Lupinus polyphyllus, a legume species with vertical inflorescences that typically show a decline in fruit and seed production from basal to distal flowers.
methodsI implemented a gradient of reproductive thinning: (1) no removal (control); (2) removal of half of the currently open inflorescences; and (3) removal of both half of the open inflorescences and all inflorescence buds (i.e. future racemes). For three randomly selected remaining inflorescences per plant, I recorded the total number of fruits within three sections along the inflorescence (basal, middle and distal). For each fruit in each of these three inflorescences, I also counted the number of viable seeds, aborted seeds and unfertilized ovules. KEY
resultsThe results strongly supported the inter-ovary competition hypothesis. Inflorescence removal increased fruit and viable seed production and reduced seed abortion, especially when both inflorescences and buds were removed. These effects occurred consistently across all positions within inflorescences, suggesting enhanced resource allocation even to distal flowers, which are often resource limited. Ovule production per flower was unaffected, indicating no over-compensation prior to fertilization. The number of fertilized ovules declined from basal to distal flowers, consistent with non-uniform pollen receipt, probably influenced by bumblebee foraging behaviour. However, fertilization ratios remained high (80-90 %) across positions and treatments.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that inflorescence thinning can effectively relax resource-based constraints within and among inflorescences, enhancing female success without altering pollination dynamics. This contributes to our understanding of how architectural plasticity and developmental constraints shape reproductive trade-offs in flowering plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.