ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Accessible, Realistic Genome Simulation with Selection Using stdpopsim.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Popformer: Learning general signatures of positive selection with a self-supervised transformer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Fast pairwise coalescence enables gene-resolution scans for recent selection in diverse human populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Coalescence and translation: A language model for population genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Benchmarking imputation accuracy in the presence or absence of a reference panel.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Popformer: Learning general signatures of positive selection with a self-supervised transformer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The performance of genetic-constraint metrics varies significantly across the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Tracing the evolutionary histories of ultra-rare variants using variational dating of large ancestral recombination graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- GHIST 2024: The First Genomic History Inference Strategies Tournament.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- SimHumanity: Using SLiM 5.0 to run whole-genome simulations of human evolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selection is a fundamental evolutionary force that shapes patterns of genetic variation across species. However, simulations incorporating realistic selection along heterogeneous genomes in complex demographic histories are challenging, limiting our ability to benchmark statistical methods aimed at detecting selection and to explore theoretical predictions. stdpopsim is a community-maintained simulation library that already provides an extensive catalog of species-specific population genetic models. Here, we present a major extension to the stdpopsim framework that enables simulation of various modes of selection, including background selection, selective sweeps, and arbitrary distributions of fitness effects (DFE) acting on annotated subsets of the genome (for instance, exons). This extension maintains stdpopsim's core principles of reproducibility and accessibility while adding support for species-specific genomic annotations and published DFE estimates. We demonstrate the utility of this framework by comparing methods for demographic inference, DFE estimation, and selective sweep detection across several species and scenarios. Our results demonstrate the robustness of demographic inference methods to selection on linked sites, reveal the sensitivity of DFE-inference methods to model assumptions, and show how genomic features, like recombination rate and functional sequence density, influence power to detect selective sweeps. This extension to stdpopsim provides a powerful new resource for the population genetics community to explore the interplay between selection and other evolutionary forces in a reproducible, user-friendly framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.