Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993999›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2026

Dynamic microtubules as sensors in animal cells.

Timothy J Mitchison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Timothy J MitchisonHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: timothy_mitchison@hms.havard.edu.

Funding

Cell and Chemical Biology of MicrotubulesR35GM131753 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Timothy J Mitchison · 2019 to 2026
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubules physically organize eukaryotic cells by serving as structural elements and polarized transport tracks. This article advances the hypothesis that dynamic microtubules also serve as sensors of cell shape and cytoplasmic state, building on ideas proposed for higher plant cells. Microtubule polymerization dynamics and lattice structure are sensitive to mechanical, chemical, and signaling inputs that alter the balance between microtubules and soluble tubulin and regulate MAP binding affinity. These changes are detected by transducers, which include the GTP exchange factor GEF-H1 (ARHGEF2) and MARK family kinases. The resulting signals regulate cytoplasmic behavior, gene expression, and tissue physiology. The microtubule-destabilizing drugs colchicine and plinabulin may mimic sensing of pathophysiological cues by microtubules, leading to activation of gene expression programs that promote cell survival, growth, and repair, which account for the therapeutic actions of the drugs. In tissue cells with stable morphologies, the sensory functions of microtubules may be as or more important than their architectural functions. This reframing of microtubule biology suggests new directions for mechanistic inquiry and drug discovery.

Indexed as

MicrotubulesAnimalsHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID40993999
PMCPMC13267877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.