Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993913›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

Splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS: Trocar placement, docking settings, and surgical strategy.

Filippo Carannante, Valentina Miacci, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Martina Marrelli, Marco Caricato, Jim S Khan, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS: Trocar placement, docking settings, and surgical strategy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Filippo CarannanteUOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3618-8431
Valentina MiacciUOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7158-9068
Guglielmo Niccolò PiozziDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-9202
Martina MarrelliUOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-0502
Marco CaricatoUOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-1615
Jim S KhanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-4495
Gabriella Teresa CapolupoUOC Chirurgia Colorettale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-8180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRobotic surgery has been widely adopted in colorectal surgery worldwide over the last decade, but it is still associated with significant cost. With the recent introduction of new robotic platforms, several studies reported the feasibility of different surgical procedures using newer robotic platforms. This study aims to present the first case series of colonic splenic flexure resection with the novel platform robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) Hugo™. Tips for effective setup of the system and detailed configuration of tilt and docking angles are also provided.

methodsThree cases of colonic splenic flexure resection with Hugo RAS™ system are reported. OR setup and port placement allowing for a full robotic resection were used to perform vascular ligation, colonic splenic flexure mobilization, and side-to-side linear intracorporeal anastomosis, without the need for re-docking.

resultsMean docking time was 11 (range 8-14) minutes and the median total operating time was 243 (range 180-350) minutes. Mean estimated blood loss was 116 (range 50-300) mL. No intraoperative complications or conversions were observed. One patient developed postoperative pneumonia.

conclusionsTotal robotic splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS system is feasible with good postoperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm our results and to evaluate the surgical strategy and setup.

Indexed as

ColectomyColon, TransverseRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeTreatment Outcomecolon cancercolorectal surgeryHUGO RASoncological surgeryrobotic surgerysplenic flexure

Identifiers

PMID40993913
PMCPMC12460977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.