ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026
Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction With an Undergraduate Research Project.
Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction With an Undergraduate Research Project.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this research paper was to explore Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) undergraduate student views of a research project (RP) that comprises part of the curriculum at Cardiff University (CU), Wales.
method4th and 5th year students undertaking the RP were issued an anonymous cross-sectional survey. 66 responses were obtained, giving a response rate of 52%. The questionnaire consisted of Likert-style items, a satisfaction score and free-text responses. Jamovi and Excel were used to conduct statistical analysis (multiple linear regression, t-tests and Cronbach's alpha) of the results along with thematic analysis of the free-text responses.
resultsStudents generally had a positive response to the RP and felt that the RP helped to improve their research skills. The responses showed a positive correlation between satisfaction and student input into the project topic (estimate = 0.84, p = 0.03), understanding of the purpose of the RP (estimate = 0.69, p = 0.023), perceived improvement of research skills (estimate = 0.97, p < 0.001), and how prepared students felt to begin their project (estimate = 0.92, p = 0.004). There were, however, areas of the RP which students found challenging, such as the balance of completing the RP alongside clinical time, as well as arranging timely interactions with supervisors.
conclusionsOverall, students had a positive outlook on the RP, with students who felt more prepared to begin the project and those who felt the project had improved their skills perceiving the project more favourably. This paper provides some insight into how such a project could be improved, for example, considering an increased timeline or a group format of the project along with future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.