ArticleBioData mining2025
Construction and validation of a machine learning-based model predicting early readmission in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a prospective two-center cohort study.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly 30-day readmission remains a significant burden on the socioeconomic and healthcare system in the context of decompensated cirrhosis. Early recognition and accurate identification are crucial. However, current evidence is elusive and traditional scores concerning liver disease severity are lacking specificity and sensitivity. We sought to construct and validate an explainable machine learning (ML)-based prediction model, and evaluate its prognostic implementation in patients readmitted due to acute episodes. The prediction model for discovery and validation was based on a two-center prospective investigation. Our discovery sample, comprising 636 patients with cirrhosis, was divided into a training set and a test set, with an additional cohort of 150 patients serving as an external validation. Eleven ML methods were performed to establish an indicative model based on a variety of easily accessible and obtainable variables from the electronic health record. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), alongside several evaluation parameters, was used for comparison regarding predictive performance. Considering feature importance and final model explanation, we adopted the SHapley Additive exPlanation method for ranking. Furthermore, prognostic implementation was verified by subgrouping according to the final model and clinical outcomes during follow-up.
resultsAmong all 11 ML algorithms, the random forest (RF) algorithm represented the best discriminatory capability. Processing feature reduction generated a final 7-feature RF model with explainability based on the importance ranking. Our constructed model was of moderately accurate prediction pertaining to internal and external validations, with respective AUCs of 0.853 and 0.838, which was further transformed into an online tool to facilitate daily practice. Patients positively adjudged by the prediction model had aggravated underlying disease severity and poor psychophysiologic reservation.
conclusionsThe final explainable ML model was capable of predicting early readmission and was closely connected with adverse outcomes in individual patients experiencing decompensated cirrhosis. Notably, it allayed the "black-box" concerns inherent to ML techniques with an indirect interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.