ReviewParasites & vectors2025
Hepatozoon infections in domestic and wild Carnivora: etiology, prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and treatment, and redescription of Hepatozoon silvestris, H. martis, and H. ursi.
Review in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vector-borne pathogens in dogs from different regions of Afghanistan.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity and spatial distribution of Hepatozoon spp. in domestic cats from Argentina.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges in the Diagnosis of Vector-Borne Protozoal Infections in Veterinary Medicine.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tick-Borne Bacteria and Protozoa inBiology · 2026Article
- Hepatozoon martis in Italy: first evidence based on histopathological characterization and molecular confirmation in Martes foina.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatozoon spp. are common pathogens in dogs and other Carnivora in many parts of the world, especially in the tropics. There is considerable taxonomic debate concerning the Hepatozoon species infecting Carnivora. Morphological descriptions of several Hepatozoon species are inadequate and their validity is questionable. Additionally, different terminology has been used for the description of life cycle stages. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the Hepatozoon species in the Carnivora, using a uniform terminology. Worldwide prevalence of clinical and subclinical Hepatozoon infections for the past century is tabulated and critically evaluated. We also review the epizootiology, clinical signs, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatozoonosis in the Carnivora. The morphology and life cycles of seven valid species with known merogonic stages (Hepatozoon americanum, H. canis, H. felis, H. martis, H. rufi, H. silvestris, H. ursi) are summarized in a table using standard terminology. Additional information on H. apri, H. martis, and H. silvestris life cycle stages is provided. Information lacking for H. procyonis, H. luiperdjie and H. ingwe is discussed. The relevance of H. mustelis, H. banethi and H. ewingi is discussed and they are considered as invalid species. For the benefit of future researchers, worldwide reports of prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis, and treatment of Hepatozoon infections in domestic and wild Carnivora for the past century are summarized in tables alphabetically and chronologically for each country. Co-infections of H. canis, H. americanum, H. felis, and H. silvestris are summarized and discussed. The role of Hepatozoon infections causing clinical illness in wild Carnivora is discussed, particularly for red foxes, coyotes, and mustelids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.