ArticleBiology of sex differences2025
Global sex disparities in lifetime risk of alopecia areata: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study, 1990 to 2021.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Burden and Future Projections of Alopecia Areata: A Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlopecia areata (AA) represents a significant autoimmune disorder affecting hair follicles, with sex differences that have yet to reach scientific consensus. The regional and temporal, age-related, and socioeconomic dimensions of sex-based lifetime risk disparities remain inadequately characterized and require further investigation.
methods(1) We estimated AA lifetime risk using the adjusted for multiple primaries method. We evaluated regional and temporal features of sex disparities through Average Annual Percentage Change analysis, with future projections to 2050 via ARIMA modeling. (2) Age-stratified sex disparity features were analyzed. (3) We evaluated AA risk associations with Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) variations through Spearman correlation analysis and concentration indices to quantify female-to-male relative risk.
results(1) Global lifetime risk increased from 29.89% (95% CI, 29.83%-29.94%) to 31.66% (31.61%-31.71%) in females, and from 15.91% (15.86%-15.95%) to 16.93% (16.88%-16.97%) in males between 1990 and 2021. The female-to-male lifetime risk ratio remained stable, measuring 1.88 (1.87-1.89) in 1990 and 1.87 (1.86-1.88) in 2021. Future projections through 2050 indicate increasing lifetime risks reaching 34.44% (32.99%-35.89%) for females and 19.06% (17.50%-20.63%) for males, despite comparatively faster growth rates observed in the male population (9.83% vs. 7.01% for females). Both sexes exhibited similar regional distribution features. (2) Sex differences in age-specific risk features were notable: females exhibited a high lifetime risk window between ages 20-50 years, while males demonstrated a narrower window primarily between ages 20-30 years. Female lifetime risk consistently peaked in the 30-39 age group regardless of SDI level, whereas males displayed significant SDI-dependent variations, with peak lifetime risks occurring at ages 20-29 in high-SDI regions versus ages 30-39 in the other areas. Females showed a slower decline in residual risk with increasing age compared to males, resulting in progressively higher female-to-male risk ratios that were particularly pronounced in high-SDI regions, reaching 4.51 (3.42-5.95) in the 70-79 age cohort. (3) With increasing SDI levels (reflecting socioeconomic development), females exhibited more pronounced risk elevation than males. Females exhibited consistently lower concentration indices relative to males, maintaining stable trends, while male concentration indices have shown a declining trend in recent years. The female-to-male ratio of concentration indices has shown a consistent upward trend since reaching its lowest point of 0.62 (0.51-0.76) in 1993, rising to 0.75 (0.60-0.95) by 2021. High SDI regions persistently demonstrate the lowest female-to-male concentration indices.
conclusionsOur analysis reveals pronounced sex disparities in global AA lifetime risk: consistently higher risk in females across regions and time periods, prolonged age-related risk window with slower decline in females, and greater risk elevation in females with increasing SDI levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.