Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993753›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2025

Tdap, MenACWY, HPV, seasonal influenza, and COVID-19 vaccination status among US teens aged 13-17 years in 2022.

Neeta P Regmi, Angela K Ulrich, Zuofu Huang, Angelina Sassi, Nicole E Basta

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neeta P RegmiDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1260 Mayo Building, MMC 807 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. pokhr020@umn.edu.
Angela K UlrichCenter for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Zuofu HuangDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Angelina SassiDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Nicole E BastaDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) routinely recommends adolescents receive tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY); and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines at age 11-12 years and routinely recommends influenza and COVID-19 vaccines annually for all adolescents, based on recommendations in 2023. We aimed to assess the overall proportion of US teens who are up-to-date (UTD) on receiving Tdap, MenACWY, and HPV vaccines by age 13 and the proportion who received seasonal influenza vaccine, the initial COVID-19 vaccination series and the initial COVID-19 booster. We also aimed to determine the relationship between multiple socio-demographic factors with the following: UTD status, and receipt of seasonal influenza vaccine, and receipt of COVID-19 vaccines.

methodsWe analyzed the 2022 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen). We estimated the proportion of teens 13-17 years old vaccinated for Tdap, MenACWY, and HPV by age 13, categorizing participants as "fully UTD", "partially UTD" and "not vaccinated" for these three vaccines and we assessed coverage of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the following outcomes: UTD status for these three vaccines, seasonal influenza vaccination, and COVID-19 vaccination. We reported adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsOf the 15,971 adolescents eligible for this analysis; 60.6% (95%CI: 59.8-61.3%) were fully UTD for Tdap, MenACWY and HPV by age 13, 29.6% (95%CI: 28.9-30.3%) partially UTD, and 9.8% (95%CI: 9.4-10.3%) were not vaccinated. When compared to fully UTD adolescents, those partially UTD and not vaccinated had significantly lower odds of receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine, initial COVID-19 vaccination series, and initial COVID-19 booster.

conclusionNearly 2 out of 5 adolescents aged 13 to 17 years in 2022 were not fully UTD for Tdap, MenACWY, and HPV vaccines by age 13. Being UTD by age 13 for these vaccines was significantly associated with subsequently receiving seasonal influenza and COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthGuideline AdherenceVaccination CoverageVaccinesAdolescentCOVID-19 VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleInfluenza VaccinesLogistic ModelsMaleMeningococcal VaccinesOdds RatioPapillomavirus VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesMenACWYMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinesVaccines, ConjugateAdolescent(s)ImmunizationNIS-TeenUp-to-dateUTDVaccinesWell-child checkup

Identifiers

PMID40993753
PMCPMC12461998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.