ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
A dual-branch deep learning network for circulating tumor cells classification.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Membrane Interface Technologies for Detection and Isolation of CTCs and EVs: Advances and Opportunities in Liquid Biopsy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Early Screening of Cancers: Emerging Technologies and New Prospects.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood are crucial for prognosis, treatment response, disease monitoring, and personalized therapy. However, identifying CTCs remains challenging due to their scarcity and heterogeneity, even with advanced deep learning models.
methodsThis study introduces an innovative hybrid framework combining a dual-branch network with traditional image processing techniques and automated CTC identification. By incorporating image and fluorescence attributes, the framework enhances feature representation robustness. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, and recall metrics and comparisons with pathologists' manual counting.
resultsThe framework achieved 97.05% accuracy in distinguishing CTCs from non-CTCs, with performance closely matching pathologists' manual counting in survival prediction. The dual-branch network improved efficiency by leveraging segmentation algorithms, surpassing conventional methods. Clinical trials confirmed its practicality for direct clinical use.
conclusionsThe proposed framework enhances CTC identification accuracy and efficiency, demonstrating strong clinical applicability. Its output results can be directly utilized for prognosis without manual intervention, offering significant potential for personalized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.