ArticlePlant methods2025
A new efficient immunoprotocol to detect chromosomal/nuclear proteins along with repetitive DNA in squash preparations of formalin-fixed, long-stored root tips.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein detection on large somatic chromosomes typically includes paraformaldehyde fixation and squashing of enzymatically softened root tips in a buffer. It often suffers from chromosome clumping, poor chromosome morphology, non-specific fluorescence, insufficient immunoreactivity, which collectively reduce the credibility of immunolabeling, hindering its effective combination with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Material harvesting and pre-detection steps must be completed within a short time, usually one day, which complicates research. The aim of this study was to develop a simple efficient squash-based protocol for technically demanding formaldehyde-fixed large chromosomes/nuclei (Allium, Scilla, Tradescantia), that ensures: long-term storage of the fixed root tips and of slide preparations, the obtaining of high-quality immunolabeled metaphase plates/nuclear spreads with no or minimal unspecific fluorescence and running a sensitive immunoFISH-karyotyping.
resultsFixation with 10% buffered formalin was combined with prolonged or overnight storage of the fixed intact tissue in 70% ethanol, digestion with pectinase-cellulase mix in citrate buffer, moderate squashing of root tip tissues in 45% acetic acid, slide freezing followed by ethanol-aided cell adherence to a slide, storage of the preparations in glycerin, one-two cycles of microwave antigen retrieval (MWAR). This resulted in optimal chromosomal/nuclear spreading, good cell adherence to the slide, effective antigen retrieval, reduced/eliminated non-specific fluorescence, good penetration of antibodies. The MWAR-assisted protein redetection could have been performed to strengthen the signals. The protocol was compatible with FISH to perform a sensitive immunoFISH with the rDNA probe and simultaneous visualization of FISH-signals and protein foci.
conclusionAs a novel approach, the protocol includes an array of steps and options not described in chromosomal immunoprotocols that used aldehyde-fixed root tips for squashing, e.g., fixation with neutral-buffered formalin, storage of root tips in ethanol, squash in acetic acid, MWAR, protein redetection, immunoFISH-aided simultaneous DNA-protein visualization. It ensures chromosomal/nuclear spread of exceptional quality, rapid preparation of the fixing solution, prolonged storage of both fixed tissues and slide preparations, epitope redetection, sensitive immunoFISH-karyotyping. The described methodology provides unprecedented flexibility in laboratory work and significantly expands plant cyto-epigenetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.