ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2025
How to improve the construction efficiency of key medical disciplines: a three-stage DEA.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The construction of key medical disciplines plays a crucial role in enhancing the capacity of medical services, cultivating high-level medical professionals, and advancing the development of medical technology. However, there is a relative insufficiency in assessing the efficiency of constructing these key disciplines. Most existing evaluations focus primarily on health services. To address this gap, the present study evaluates the construction efficiency of key medical disciplines within Tianjin and identifies critical factors that significantly influence this efficiency, thereby providing strategies for optimization. This research employs a three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to measure the construction efficiency of key medical disciplines. The super-efficient non-expected SBM model is utilized to analyze both the first and third stages of this three-stage DEA framework. In the second stage, adjustments are made to input variables based on results from Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). Furthermore, Tobit regression analysis is conducted to examine factors influencing efficiency. The findings reveal that the average technical efficiency of key medical disciplines stands at 0.18, with only 8.57% classified as DEA efficient. The Tobit regression analysis indicates a significant positive impact from the proportion of doctoral personnel, material costs and travel costs on construction efficiency. It is essential to allocate resources rationally for developing key medical disciplines while implementing various measures aimed at optimizing both educational structures within discipline teams and financial resource allocation in order to enhance overall construction efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.