ReviewParasites & vectors2025
The toolbox for mosquito vector research.
Review in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary effects on the development and population dynamics of the Thelazia callipaeda vector Phortica okadai revealed by age-stage, two-sex life table analysis.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The work of collecting mosquitoes in the field is essential for improving knowledge about species of known and unknown vector status, their invasion dynamics, and further understanding their involvement in circulating pathogens of medical and veterinary importance. Over the years, different techniques have been developed to capture mosquitoes for entomological, pathogen transmission, and surveillance studies. For entomological and transmission dynamic research to be reliable, it is essential for mosquito specimens to be correctly identified so that their role in pathogen transmission can be appropriately assessed. Currently, modern molecular techniques support traditional morphological taxonomic identification and provide faster and more assertive identification. It is also important to test the susceptibility of potentially relevant mosquitoes or mosquitoes with unknown vector status in the laboratory to identify which species could participate in pathogen transmission. This last step toward fully performing vector incrimination of mosquito species and understanding their interactions with relevant pathogens requires proper handling of live specimens and laboratory colonization under artificial conditions to perform artificial infection studies. In this work, we aim to underscore the significance of the available tools for entomological studies and pathogen transmission research while also offering insights into the principles behind recent technological advancements that enhance the effectiveness and reliability of these studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.