Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993634›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Assessing the impacts of women's autonomy on their approval of intimate partner violence: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Mahnaz Ibrahim, Mohammad Hridoy Patwary, Anisuddin Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahnaz IbrahimInstitute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT), University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Hridoy PatwaryInstitute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT), University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anisuddin AhmedMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh. anisuddin.ahmed@uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a severe issue in many low-and middle-income countries and remains a persistent public health problem. Research suggests that controlling attitudes by husbands can increase the risk of women experiencing IPV. To delve deeper into this issue, this study aims to investigate the relationship between women's autonomy and their approval of IPV against women.

methodsThis study utilized the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017-18, a cross-sectional nationally representative survey consisting of 20,127 ever-married women aged 15-49. Both unadjusted and adjusted associations between acceptance of IPV against women and four dimensions of autonomy- economic decision-making, self-health-related decision-making, freedom of movement, and non-threatening sexual agreement within partnerships-were investigated. Chi-square tests were used to assess bivariate associations, followed by Cramer's V to measure the strength of these associations. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was then applied to estimate adjusted associations.

resultsOne in every five women approved of IPV. Among the four dimensions of women's autonomy, women having autonomy in self-health care had the lowest prevalence in accepting IPV (6.52%). Except for self-economic decision autonomy, the other three dimensions of women's autonomy showed a significant unadjusted or preliminary association with the perception of approving IPV (p-value < 0.01). Women who shared control over their earnings with their husbands, rather than exercising solo control, demonstrated higher odds of approving IPV (AOR 1.16, p-value 0.04). Additionally, women lacking the final say on important household purchases and visits to close relatives exhibited increased odds of approving IPV compared to those with sole decision-making power (AOR 1.35, p-value < 0.001; AOR 1.37, p-value < 0.001, respectively). Conversely, women who lacked the final say on their own health care were less likely to approve of IPV compared to those with sole decision-making authority (AOR 0.60, p-value < 0.001).

conclusionThis study highlighted that a significant number of women in Bangladesh approve of violence by their husbands, which could be a major obstacle to the reduction of violence in society. Further, the results indicate a significant correlation between women's autonomy-in terms of decision-making, mobility, freedom from threatening sexual relations with their husbands, and access to and control over economic resources- and their approval of IPV. Strengthening women's autonomy emerges as a vital strategy for decreasing the acceptance of IPV, advancing gender equality, and enhancing the overall well-being of women.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolencePersonal AutonomyAdolescentAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultBDHSIntimate partner violenceMultivariable binary logistic regression.Women’s autonomy

Identifiers

PMID40993634
PMCPMC12462222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.