Observational studyBMC public health2025
Motivational determinants of physical activity: a cross-sectional comparative study between two STEM student populations in Saudi Arabia.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the motivational factors influencing physical activity among college students majoring in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Saudi Arabia.
methodsAn observational, cross-cultural, and cross-sectional study was conducted at two universities in Saudi Arabia, Prince Sultan University (PSU) and King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM). Data were collected on family and PE teacher influence, availability of sports facilities and resources, persistence in physical activity, social interaction, and physical activity frequency across life stages.
resultsSignificant differences were observed between PSU and KFUPM students in family and teacher influence, access to facilities, and engagement in physical activity. PSU students reported higher levels of family support, teacher influence, and access to facilities and resources, which correlated with greater engagement in physical activities. Conversely, despite having fewer resources, KFUPM students demonstrated higher social interaction in physical activities. Regression analysis revealed that for KFUPM, social interaction within physical education was a key predictor of physical activity frequency, while for PSU, persistence and engagement were primary, with family influence as a secondary factor.
conclusionThe findings underscore the role of institutional support, resource availability, and social factors in promoting physical activity among STEM students. PSU's supportive environment and access to sports facilities significantly contribute to higher physical activity engagement. In contrast, KFUPM's emphasis on social interactions highlights the role of peer networks in fostering engagement. These insights emphasize the importance of universities establishing comprehensive support systems designed to enhance student engagement in physical activities.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Prince Sultan University (Approval Number PSU IRB2022010101).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.