ArticleBMC public health2025
Epidemiology and treatment of patients with iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia: a study on longitudinal German health claims data.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIron deficiency (ID) and ID anemia (IDA), the most common deficiency diseases, may occur as isolated diseases or secondary to a causative disorder such as menorrhagia, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and heart disease (HD). As real-world data are limited, our objective was to assess the prevalence of ID/IDA, associated comorbidity, drug treatments focusing on trivalent ferric maltol, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) with associated costs in Germany.
methodsThis retrospective, non-interventional cohort study analyzed anonymized German health claims data covering 2016–2021. Data on patients with ID/IDA and matched control individuals, subgroups of patients with ID/IDA and concurrent disease (menorrhagia, IBD, HD), as well as patients with ID/IDA treated with ferric maltol were descriptively analyzed to evaluate prevalences, comorbidities (Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [ECI]), drug prescriptions, HRU, and HRU-associated costs.
resultsIn 2021, 129,462 individuals were diagnosed with ID/IDA. Concurrent menorrhagia, IBD, and HD were observed in 34,421, 8,422, and 44,699 individuals, respectively. ID/IDA prevalences were stable throughout the study at approximately 3.3% but were higher in older individuals (up to 10.1%) and women of reproductive age (5.6–7.35%). Comorbidity burden (ECI) was two-fold higher in patients with ID/IDA than in control individuals (4.5 ± 3.6 vs. 2.3 ± 2.5, 2021 [mean ± SD]) and increased with concurrent diseases (menorrhagia [3.4 ± 2.8], IBD [5.0 ± 3.9], HD [7.9 ± 3.5]). The most frequently prescribed medication was oral bivalent iron preparation (25.0–27.5%; parenteral iron: 5.8–6.5%; oral trivalent iron: 0.2–0.7%). Ferric maltol dispensations increased slightly from 2018 to 2021 compared to other trivalent iron preparations. In patients with ID/IDA, the percentages of hospitalizations and sick leaves were higher than in control individuals (41.2% vs. 22.0%; 21.4% vs. 3.1%), corresponding to higher total costs that further increased with concurrent disease. In the subgroup of patients treated with ferric maltol (n = 686), HRU was lower in some parameters, with slightly higher ID/IDA-related total costs. Within 180 days after treatment initiation, most patients continued ferric maltol and did not switch to another iron preparation.
conclusionsDespite the heterogeneity of the disease, monitoring prevalence of ID/IDA, comorbidities, drug treatments, and HRU may help identify populations at increased health risk to optimize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.