Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993577›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Supply and demand barriers to PHC maternal care services uptake: qualitative and behavioural insights from Gombe State, Nigeria.

Mohammed M Alhaji, Laila Umar, Maryam Anike Yusuf, Robert Nyaga, Jaspreet Singh, Arizechukwu Okafor, Francis Meyo, Zarah Haruna Shayau, Zainab Ibrahim Isah, Maryam Abubakar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammed M AlhajiBusara Centre for Behavioural Economics (Busara), Abuja, Nigeria. mohammed.alhaji@busara.global.
Laila UmarNational Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.
Maryam Anike YusufBusara Centre for Behavioural Economics (Busara), Abuja, Nigeria.
Robert NyagaBusara Centre for Behavioural Economics (Busara), Nairobi, Kenya.
Jaspreet SinghBusara Centre for Behavioural Economics (Busara), New Delhi, India.
Arizechukwu OkaforBusara Centre for Behavioural Economics (Busara), Abuja, Nigeria.
Francis MeyoBusara Centre for Behavioural Economics (Busara), Nairobi, Kenya.
Zarah Haruna ShayauNational Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.
Zainab Ibrahim IsahNational Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.
Maryam AbubakarGombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency (SPHCDA), Gombe, Nigeria.
Aisha Isa UmarGombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency (SPHCDA), Gombe, Nigeria.
Yakubu Ozohu-SuleimanNational Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral factors influence maternal morbidity and mortality in northeast Nigeria, and maternal care-seeking behaviour at primary healthcare facilities is a critical factor. This study, rooted in the Social Ecological Model (SEM) of behaviour change, investigated the structural and demand-side cognitive barriers that limit antenatal and family planning care-seeking behaviour among households in Gombe State, Nigeria.

methodQualitative in-depth interviews, each lasting 60-70 min, were conducted with 56 respondents, including mothers/expectant mothers (n = 15), their household decision-makers/spouses (n = 16), community leaders (n = 16), and primary healthcare centre (PHC) service providers and volunteers (n = 9). The qualitative instrument was developed and analysed based on four core elements of the SEM: intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and community-level factors of behaviour. The study was conducted in Dukku, a rural local government area (LGA), and Yamaltu Deba, a peri-urban LGA.

resultsThe findings indicate that the direct and indirect costs of care, service quality, and PHC proximity were the main supply-side and institutional-level factors. Most of the demand-side barriers were associated with individual (poor salience), relational (limited spousal support), and community-level (traditional maternal practices) factors of the SEM model. Optimism bias, overconfidence bias, and present bias are some demand-side psychological barriers that impede maternal care uptake. Similarly, supply-side barriers, such as poor quality of care, can significantly undermine individual and community-level demand for PHC-based maternal care.

conclusionThe SEM model offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex, multi-layered factors influencing care-seeking behaviours toward antenatal care and family planning. The findings show that although relational and community-level barriers are prominent barriers to care-seeking, they are all interlinked and are fuelled by a broad scope of institutional-level barriers.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareAdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareAntenatal careBarriersBehaviourCognitive biasesDemand-sideFamily planningHealth-seekingMaternal careSocial ecological model (SEM)Supply-side

Identifiers

PMID40993577
PMCPMC12462206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.