ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Biomarker genes for model-based prediction of drought-stress perception levels in rice.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrought is a global challenge that severely restricts crop yields and threatens food security. Plants respond to drought stress by modulating gene expression before visible phenotypic changes occur. However, most studies of drought resistance have examined phenotypes after drought treatment, with little emphasis on how severely the plants were perceiving drought-stress conditions before the appearance of stress symptoms. We therefore developed drought-stress biomarkers (DSBMs) to detect drought-stress perception levels based on gene expression profiles by performing time-series transcriptome analysis and phenotypic analysis of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought conditions in the growth chamber.
resultsTime-series RNA-seq of the drought-susceptible rice cultivar IR64 revealed drastic changes in the transcriptome after 4-6 days of drought treatment in plants grown in pot culture mimicking drought conditions in the field, particularly for genes related to photosynthesis. Among the differentially expressed genes, we selected 23 DSBM genes that consistently responded to drought stress. Rehydration immediately reset the changes in expression of these DSBM genes, indicating that their expression changes reflect current drought-stress perception levels, but not stress memories. Responses of DSBM genes tended to be conserved among rice accessions, irrespective of the rice subpopulation (such as indica, aus, and japonica). We developed a machine learning model using the expression levels of DSBM genes trained by the time-series RNA-seq data for IR64. This model successfully predicted the drought-stress perception levels of various rice accessions, representing the probability of exposure to drought treatment, with an accuracy of 75%. Extreme root architecture traits, such as the largest root surface area, narrowest crown root diameter, and largest ratio of deep rooting, influenced the predicted drought-stress perception levels.
conclusionWe identified DSBM genes and developed a machine learning model as a robust tool for assessing drought-stress perception levels in rice. Monitoring and predicting drought-stress perception levels should contribute to more efficient crop management and breeding schemes. Furthermore, our dataset would serve as a resource for further understanding the mechanisms of drought resistance in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.