Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993482›Full record

ReviewBioresources and bioprocessing2025

Advancements in the application of reporter gene cell lines in bioactivity evaluation of biological products.

Kaijuan Yi, Can Wang, Huili Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaijuan YiEngineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Can WangNMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies, Shanghai Institute for Food and Drug Control, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Huili LuEngineering Research Center of Cell and Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. roadeer@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-7899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of biological product activity is a key aspect of quality control. Currently, in vitro assays serve as the primarily method employed by both companies and regulatory agencies to evaluate biological activity. Reporter Gene Assay (RGA) is a technique that investigates gene expression regulation and cellular signal transduction pathway activation through easily detectable reporter genes. RGA is highly dependent on drug mechanisms, offering high accuracy and precision, and has gained increasing recognition. The utilization of alternative analytical methods based on RGA have emerged as a prevailing trend, with a growing number of antibody drugs adopting corresponding RGA-based quality control approaches. Establishing stable expressing cell lines is essential to ensure the stability, reliability, and consistency of assays across diverse conditions when employing RGA techniques. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology mediated site-specific gene integration allows for rapid and precise insertion of exogenous genes into specific genomic loci and enables the efficient construction of stable RGA cell lines, which would significantly propel the advancement of biological activity evaluation methods.

Indexed as

Biological activityCRISPR/Cas9Reporter gene assayStable cell lineTargeted integration

Identifiers

PMID40993482
PMCPMC12460214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.