ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
The relation between breast artery calcification and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are most common causes of mortality and morbidity. The presence of breast artery calcification (BAC) was shown to be associated with CVD. We aimed to determine the relationship between BAC and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) by using strain echocardiography.Patients diagnosed with BAC between October 2023 and May 2024 were prospectively included. 100 age-matched patients without BAC were included as the control group. Patients were divided into two groups as BAC( +) and BAC(-) and further patients were grouped as LVSD( +) and LVSD(-) according to global longitudinal strain(GLS) measurements.A total of 94 patients with BAC( +) and 100 patients with BAC(-) were evaluated. When BAC(-) and BAC( +) groups were compared, GLS(-18.7 ± 2.6vs.-20.9 ± 1.7;p < 0.0001) was significantly lower in BAC( +) group and GLS was significantly decreased with increasing BAC grades (p < 0.0001). Significant deterioration in parameters indicating left ventricular diastolic function was observed in BAC ( +) group. BAC grade 3 (p = 0.002), increase in E/e' (p = 0.001), and NLr (p = 0.009) were identified as independent risk factors for LVSD. In the ROC analysis, a cut-off value of -17.3 for GLS was associated with 93.3% sensitivity of and 92.6%; specificity for predicting BAC grade 3.Presence of BAC is associated with subclinical LVSD and presence of BAC grade 3 is and independent predictor of LVSD. Detection BAC on screening mammograms may help to define patients under risk of heart failure development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40993475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.