Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993449›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Exploring the synthesis of mouse cursor tracking and drift diffusion modeling in a perceptual decision-making task.

Oliver Grenke, Stefan Scherbaum, Martin Schoemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver GrenkeDepartment of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany. oliver.grenke@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5509-6044
Stefan ScherbaumDepartment of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Martin SchoemannDepartment of Psychology, Dresden University of Technology, Zellescher Weg 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 940/3 project A8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process tracing and process modeling are the two primary behavioral approaches for uncovering human decision-making processes. However, both approaches face significant limitations: process tracing offers a large and oftentimes confusing number of measures, while process modeling relies on a minimal number of comparable trials for reliable model fitting. In our study, we explore how we can combine mouse cursor tracking and the drift diffusion model (DDM) in order to both reduce the number of cursor measures and circumvent the minimal trial amount requirements of DDM fitting. One hundred three participants completed 90 trials in a random dot kinematogram (RDK). A total of 18 cursor measures were taken from the mouse cursor tracking literature and used to predict drift rate, threshold separation, and non-decision time of the DDM via partial least squares regression. Four cursor measures contributed significantly to the prediction of the DDM parameters. When reducing the available trials, these cursor measures, in combination with response time and accuracy, performed better and remained more stable in the prediction of DDM parameters than model fitting. Our results lower the barrier for applying mouse cursor tracking for novice researchers by highlighting important cursor measures and their mapping to psychological constructs of decision-making, while also offering an approach for behavioral scientists to investigate DDM components in experimental setups with a restricted number of trials.

Indexed as

Decision MakingModels, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultCognitive mappingDecision-makingDrift diffusion modelMovement trackingPerceptionProcess tracing

Identifiers

PMID40993449
PMCPMC12460430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.