ArticleNature nanotechnology2025
Full-length protein classification via cysteine fingerprinting in solid-state nanopores.
Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Rate Fingerprinting of Protein Isoforms by Quasi-regulated Enzyme-free Transport Through CytK Nanopores.Research square · 2026Article
- Comparative Benchmarking of Glass and Silicon Nitride Nanopores for Single-Molecule Detection.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Interrogating nanopores with light: optipore sensing for single molecule analyses.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Proteoforms as the true units of physiological function.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Nanopore-based massively parallel sensing for peptide profiling and protein identification.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Single-molecule electrical protein fingerprinting in solid-state nanopores.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in single-molecule technologies are transforming the field of protein analysis. Solid-state nanopores provide an effective method to linearize and thread full-length proteins in a single file. However, slowing their rapid translocation remains a challenge for accurate, time-resolved ion-current-based fingerprinting. In this work, we present a click-chemistry-based strategy for covalently attaching short oligonucleotides to cysteine residues on denatured proteins across a broad range of molecular weights. The negatively charged oligonucleotides increase the capture rate by a factor of ten compared with native proteins and induce a distinct 'stick-slip' motion that slows protein passage through the nanopore by more than 20-fold. These oligonucleotide tags also produce characteristic, time-resolved ion current pulses that serve as unique protein-specific signatures. To uncover the physical mechanism responsible for the protein translocation dynamics, we model our system using all-atom molecular dynamics and finite element simulations. By leveraging a supervised machine learning classifier, we demonstrate that a small number of translocation events is sufficient to identify individual proteins, achieving near-perfect classification accuracy. To demonstrate the robustness of the method, we successfully distinguish between VEGF-A isoforms (VEGF-165 and VEGF-121), which are relevant to cancer diagnostics, within a mixed protein sample. Our nanopore-based fingerprinting technique eliminates the need for affinity reagents, such as protein-specific antibodies, or motor proteins, offering a rapid, direct and cost-effective approach for single-molecule protein identification and classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.