Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993343›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025

Self-reported smoking, urine cotinine, and risk of incident hypertension: findings from the PREVEND prospective cohort study.

Setor K Kunutsor, Reyhaneh Rikhtehgaran, Daan J Touw, Robin P F Dullaart, Stephan J L Bakker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Setor K KunutsorSection of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada. skk31@cantab.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2625-0273
Reyhaneh RikhtehgaranSection of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5815-2769
Daan J TouwDepartment of Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robin P F DullaartDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stephan J L BakkerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-6791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the associations of smoking status assessed by self-report versus urine cotinine with incident hypertension risk. Using the PREVEND study, a prospective cohort conducted in the Netherlands, smoking status was assessed at baseline by self-reports and urine cotinine in participants without a history of hypertension. Participants were classified as never, former, light current (≤10 cigarettes/day), and heavy current smokers (>10 cigarettes/day) by self-report, and analogously by urine cotinine: <100 ng/mL (never), 100-500 ng/mL (former), 501-1456 ng/mL (light current), and >1456 ng/mL (heavy current). Incident hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or the initiation of antihypertensive medications. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated. The cohort comprised of 3296 participants (mean age 49 years, 46.0% male). The distribution of participants by self-reported smoking category was: never (n = 1045), former (n = 1271), light current (n = 379), and heavy current (n = 601). Based on urine cotinine, the distribution was: never (n = 2288), former (n = 161), light current (n = 404), and heavy current (n = 443). During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 832 participants developed hypertension. Compared with self-reported never smokers, the multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) for hypertension were 1.03 (0.87-1.23) for former, 1.55 (1.22-1.97) for light current, and 1.43 (1.17-1.76) for heavy current smokers. Using urine cotinine (never smokers as referent), the corresponding adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.04 (0.74-1.45), 1.32 (1.06-1.64), and 1.62 (1.34-1.95). Light and heavy current smoking, as assessed by self-reports and urine cotinine, are each associated with an increased risk of hypertension.

Indexed as

CotinineHypertensionSelf ReportSmokingAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersCotinine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.