ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
Self-reported smoking, urine cotinine, and risk of incident hypertension: findings from the PREVEND prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker-based assessment of tobacco smoke exposure in Saudi females via analysis of urinary cotinine level.PloS one · 2026Article
- Association of active and passive smoking with noncommunicable diseases in a large health check-up population: A cross-sectional study in Changzhi, Shanxi province, China.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the associations of smoking status assessed by self-report versus urine cotinine with incident hypertension risk. Using the PREVEND study, a prospective cohort conducted in the Netherlands, smoking status was assessed at baseline by self-reports and urine cotinine in participants without a history of hypertension. Participants were classified as never, former, light current (≤10 cigarettes/day), and heavy current smokers (>10 cigarettes/day) by self-report, and analogously by urine cotinine: <100 ng/mL (never), 100-500 ng/mL (former), 501-1456 ng/mL (light current), and >1456 ng/mL (heavy current). Incident hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or the initiation of antihypertensive medications. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated. The cohort comprised of 3296 participants (mean age 49 years, 46.0% male). The distribution of participants by self-reported smoking category was: never (n = 1045), former (n = 1271), light current (n = 379), and heavy current (n = 601). Based on urine cotinine, the distribution was: never (n = 2288), former (n = 161), light current (n = 404), and heavy current (n = 443). During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 832 participants developed hypertension. Compared with self-reported never smokers, the multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) for hypertension were 1.03 (0.87-1.23) for former, 1.55 (1.22-1.97) for light current, and 1.43 (1.17-1.76) for heavy current smokers. Using urine cotinine (never smokers as referent), the corresponding adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.04 (0.74-1.45), 1.32 (1.06-1.64), and 1.62 (1.34-1.95). Light and heavy current smoking, as assessed by self-reports and urine cotinine, are each associated with an increased risk of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40993343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.