ArticleCommunications biology2025
Analysis of the microbiota of raw commercial feline diets to prioritize food safety investigations.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of South China Tigers Under Different Dietary Treatments.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Variations in the Gut Microbiota of Stray and Domestic Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Domestication shapes the gut microbial structure and metabolic function in felids: a metagenomic study of wild and domestic cats.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiota sharing between people and their companion animals is a concern for development of antimicrobial resistance. To assess the risks associated with feeding raw products to cats, with an emphasis on previously understudied freeze-dried products, a collection of 112 conventional and raw products was purchased and investigated using a combination of cultivation and high-throughput sequencing techniques. Here we show that bacterial cultures were exclusively isolated from raw foods. A total of 19 genera were cultured including Salmonella, Clostridium, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Cronobacter. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fulva, and Stenotrophomonas lactitubi were isolated from frozen raw products, and 6 Bacillus strains harbored carbapenemase gene bla
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.