SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2025
Transforming histologic assessment: artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and personalized treatment.
Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-assisted histomorphological stratification of endometrial cancer: real-world validation of foundation models for molecular subtyping.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Comprehensive Cross-Cancer Translational Readiness Analysis Across 18 Malignancies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Biology, Pathophysiology, and Histopathology in the Era of H3F3A.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of long-term prognosis in cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Perineural invasion in solid tumors: biological foundations and the emerging integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in breast and gynecologic oncology: from molecular prediction to multimodal integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Molecular cytopathology: The future of pathology?CytoJournal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming histologic assessment, evolving from a diagnostic adjunct to an integral component of clinical decision-making. Over the past decade, AI applications have significantly advanced histopathology, facilitating tasks from tissue classification to predicting cancer prognosis, gene alterations, and therapy responses. These developments are supported by the availability of high-quality whole-slide images (WSIs) and publicly accessible databases like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), which integrate histologic, genomic, and clinical data. Deep learning techniques replicate and enhance pathologists' decisions, addressing challenges such as inter-observer variability and diagnostic reproducibility. Moreover, AI enables robust predictions of patient prognosis, actionable gene statuses, and therapy responses, offering rapid, cost-effective alternatives to conventional methods. Innovations such as histomorphologic phenotype clusters and spatial transcriptomics have further refined cancer stratification and treatment personalization. In addition, multimodal approaches integrating histologic images with clinical and molecular data have achieved superior predictive accuracy and explainability. Nevertheless, challenges remain in verifying AI predictions, particularly for prognostic applications and ensuring accessibility in resource-limited settings. Addressing these challenges will require standardized datasets, ethical frameworks, and scalable infrastructure. While AI is revolutionizing histologic assessment for cancer diagnosis and treatment, optimizing digital infrastructure and long-term strategies is essential for its widespread adoption in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.