Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993310›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2025

Transforming histologic assessment: artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and personalized treatment.

Manabu Takamatsu

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Manabu TakamatsuDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. manabu.takamatsu@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-5802

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP21K15393MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP25K10276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming histologic assessment, evolving from a diagnostic adjunct to an integral component of clinical decision-making. Over the past decade, AI applications have significantly advanced histopathology, facilitating tasks from tissue classification to predicting cancer prognosis, gene alterations, and therapy responses. These developments are supported by the availability of high-quality whole-slide images (WSIs) and publicly accessible databases like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), which integrate histologic, genomic, and clinical data. Deep learning techniques replicate and enhance pathologists' decisions, addressing challenges such as inter-observer variability and diagnostic reproducibility. Moreover, AI enables robust predictions of patient prognosis, actionable gene statuses, and therapy responses, offering rapid, cost-effective alternatives to conventional methods. Innovations such as histomorphologic phenotype clusters and spatial transcriptomics have further refined cancer stratification and treatment personalization. In addition, multimodal approaches integrating histologic images with clinical and molecular data have achieved superior predictive accuracy and explainability. Nevertheless, challenges remain in verifying AI predictions, particularly for prognostic applications and ensuring accessibility in resource-limited settings. Addressing these challenges will require standardized datasets, ethical frameworks, and scalable infrastructure. While AI is revolutionizing histologic assessment for cancer diagnosis and treatment, optimizing digital infrastructure and long-term strategies is essential for its widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineClinical Decision-MakingCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDeep LearningHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPrognosisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID40993310
PMCPMC12689690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.