ArticleScientific reports2025
Time series anomaly detection in helpline call trends for early detection of COVID-19 spread across Sweden, 2020.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely detection and surveillance of disease community spread is a potent tool for implementing effective public health interventions. This study investigates the National Telehealth Service (1177 helpline) across 18 regions in Sweden in 2020 to identify early signals of community transmission of COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic. Focusing on calls related to key COVID-19 symptoms (cough, fever, and breathing difficulties in adults), we analyze their frequency and distribution across referral categories, comparing them to 2019 data. We employ an explainable time series anomaly detection algorithm using daily call data to identify the first collective anomalies across regions. The results show that anomalies in call data were correlated with, but preceded, the first confirmed case infected in Sweden by a median of 7 days (IQR: 2.5-10.5) and the first hospitalized case infected in Sweden by a median of 13 days (IQR: 7.25-16). They also preceded the estimated onset of community spread, indicated by the absolute confirmed cases (median: 24.5, IQR: 18.25-32.5), and severe outcomes defined by hospitalizations (median: 33, IQR: 27.25-44). These findings showcase how helpline call monitoring, using time series anomaly detection, can aid early outbreak detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.