ArticleScientific reports2025
Metacontrol is reflected in phasic but not tonic cognitive control dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metacontrol, the regulation of cognitive strategies to balance persistence and flexibility, has been theorized to operate either as a tonic state, maintaining a consistent neural bias, or as a phasic mechanism, dynamically adjusting to situational demands. This study tested these scenarios by examining the relationship between metacontrol biases and changes in the aperiodic exponent of EEG activity. Behavioral results replicated well-established effects. Neural analyses revealed significant post-stimulus increases in the aperiodic exponent during incongruent trials, reflecting enhanced persistence in response to high-conflict conditions. Crucially, the absence of pre-stimulus effects supports the phasic hypothesis, suggesting metacontrol biases emerge dynamically rather than maintaining a stable tonic state. Correlational analyses showed task-specific and transient metacontrol biases. Persistence aligned with high-conflict demands in incongruent trials, while flexibility remained general across conditions. The lack of cross-task correlations between creativity and Flanker tasks further supports the phasic view, where biases adapt to immediate task requirements rather than representing stable traits. These findings align with reactive control theories, emphasizing transient, context-dependent neural adjustments. This study provides evidence for a phasic account of metacontrol, where cognitive control states dynamically shift to meet task-specific demands. This adaptive flexibility underscores the importance of real-time adjustments in human cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.