ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation study of radial and spiral based volumetric thermometry for monitoring of hepatic microwave ablation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microwave ablation (MWA) of hepatic tumors benefits from MR thermometry, enabling real-time temperature monitoring to guide treatment and protect healthy tissue. However, MR thermometry in the abdomen is challenging due to respiratory and intestinal motion. This study evaluates two advanced 3D imaging sequences, Stack-of-Stars (Stars) and Stack-of-Spirals (Spirals), for precise MWA thermometry in phantom and volunteer experiments. Spirals demonstrated superior temperature precision, with a standard deviation of 1.61 ± 0.11 °C in unheated regions, compared to 4.87 ± 0.74 °C for Stars (single respiratory cycle). In heated regions, Spirals achieved a lower RMSE (0.6 ± 0.1 °C vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 °C for Stars) and a higher Dice score for ablation zone delineation (0.88 ± 0.02 vs. 0.77 ± 0.09). Spirals also produced sharper images with fewer artifacts under simulated respiratory motion, while Stars showed streaking artifacts due to higher undersampling. These findings highlight Spirals' potential for accurate real-time thermometry in liver ablation. Future work should focus on improving reconstruction speed and mitigating susceptibility artifacts to enable clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.