Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993204›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Human corticospinal tract lateralization at the height of the internal capsule is not related to handedness.

M Domin, R Lindenberg, M Lotze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M DominFunctional Imaging Unit, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
R LindenbergDepartment of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Department of Neurology, Heinrich- Heine University Duesseldorf, ZAR Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
M LotzeFunctional Imaging Unit, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. martin.lotze@uni-greifswald.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating the integrity of the corticospinal tract at the height of the posterior limb of the internal capsule with a lateralization index has been applied to predict upper limb motor recovery after stroke in numerous diffusion tensor imaging studies. When comparing patient groups with healthy controls in this context, matching for age and gender is generally recommended. Since a generalized lateralization of diffusion strength to the dominant left hemisphere has been reported, it can be argued that handedness should also be accounted for. To address this question, we used the Human Connectome Project data set containing 1,065 diffusion-weighted MRI sets as well as information on handedness as defined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. We hypothesized that handedness might be related to diffusion strength of the corticospinal tract. As commonly employed, we extracted fractional anisotropy values at the level of the internal capsule to calculate a laterality index. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no association between corticospinal tract diffusion strength and handedness. We conclude that for handedness, no balancing between patient and control groups is needed when comparing corticospinal tract diffusivity parameters.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityInternal CapsulePyramidal TractsAdultAgedConnectomeDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCorticospinal tractDTIFractional anisotropyHandednessHuman connectome projectStroke

Identifiers

PMID40993204
PMCPMC12460680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.