ArticleScientific reports2025
Human corticospinal tract lateralization at the height of the internal capsule is not related to handedness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating the integrity of the corticospinal tract at the height of the posterior limb of the internal capsule with a lateralization index has been applied to predict upper limb motor recovery after stroke in numerous diffusion tensor imaging studies. When comparing patient groups with healthy controls in this context, matching for age and gender is generally recommended. Since a generalized lateralization of diffusion strength to the dominant left hemisphere has been reported, it can be argued that handedness should also be accounted for. To address this question, we used the Human Connectome Project data set containing 1,065 diffusion-weighted MRI sets as well as information on handedness as defined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. We hypothesized that handedness might be related to diffusion strength of the corticospinal tract. As commonly employed, we extracted fractional anisotropy values at the level of the internal capsule to calculate a laterality index. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no association between corticospinal tract diffusion strength and handedness. We conclude that for handedness, no balancing between patient and control groups is needed when comparing corticospinal tract diffusivity parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.