Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993194›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Patient needs in the context of gynecologic oncology and breast cancer: a validation study.

Susanne Theis, H Frühwein, A Hasenburg, M Moehler, N W Paul

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne TheisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. susanne.theis2@unimedizin-mainz.de.
H FrühweinInstitute of History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
A HasenburgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
M MoehlerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
N W PaulInstitute of History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Am Pulverturm 13, 55131, Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical advancements and therapeutic innovations are progressing rapidly, necessitating corresponding adaptations in the delivery of patient-centered care. This study explores the needs of women diagnosed with gynecologic and breast cancers, using the frameworks of the National Academy of Medicine and the Picker Institute as reflective lenses. We conducted a qualitative, single-center study employing grounded theory methodology. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 20 patients undergoing treatment for gynecologic malignancies and breast cancer at a university medical center. Interviews covered multiple phases of illness, including treatment initiation, adaptation, abstention, and future-oriented decisions. Data were analyzed inductively using constant comparative methods. Findings largely affirmed the relevance of the eight established domains of patient-centered care - personal values, clear information and education, emotional support, involvement of family and friends, physical comfort, coordinated care, continuity, and access to treatment. Three additional insights emerged: needs vary according to illness phase and tend to taper over time; they are grounded in ethical dimensions, including social identity, epistemic agency, and moral distress; and they are interdependent, requiring holistic rather than isolated responses. These results highlight that effective patient-centered care must account not only for the content of care but also for its timing, context and ethical significance, warranting integration into standard oncological practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleAdultAgedFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchBreast cancerClinical ethicsGrounded theoryGynecologic oncologyNeedsPatient centered careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40993194
PMCPMC12460812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.