ArticleScientific reports2025
Patient needs in the context of gynecologic oncology and breast cancer: a validation study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical advancements and therapeutic innovations are progressing rapidly, necessitating corresponding adaptations in the delivery of patient-centered care. This study explores the needs of women diagnosed with gynecologic and breast cancers, using the frameworks of the National Academy of Medicine and the Picker Institute as reflective lenses. We conducted a qualitative, single-center study employing grounded theory methodology. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 20 patients undergoing treatment for gynecologic malignancies and breast cancer at a university medical center. Interviews covered multiple phases of illness, including treatment initiation, adaptation, abstention, and future-oriented decisions. Data were analyzed inductively using constant comparative methods. Findings largely affirmed the relevance of the eight established domains of patient-centered care - personal values, clear information and education, emotional support, involvement of family and friends, physical comfort, coordinated care, continuity, and access to treatment. Three additional insights emerged: needs vary according to illness phase and tend to taper over time; they are grounded in ethical dimensions, including social identity, epistemic agency, and moral distress; and they are interdependent, requiring holistic rather than isolated responses. These results highlight that effective patient-centered care must account not only for the content of care but also for its timing, context and ethical significance, warranting integration into standard oncological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.