Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993105›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2025

Protein extraction from Buckwheat, Chondrus crispus, and Spelt and assessment of nutritional benefits and limitations in vitro.

Ethan Cain, Suzanne M Hodgkinson, Warren McNabb, André Brodkorb, Linda Giblin, Maria Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ethan CainRiddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Suzanne M HodgkinsonRiddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Warren McNabbRiddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
André BrodkorbTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, P61 C996, Ireland.
Linda GiblinTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, P61 C996, Ireland.
Maria HayesDepartment of Food BioSciences, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, D15 DY05, Ireland. Maria.Hayes@teagasc.ie.

Funding

BIOPROTEIN project MBDY0360Irish Department of Agriculture, Food, and the Marine 16/RC/3835Teagasc Walsh Scholarship 2018049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant protein consumption has increased globally but concerns exist regarding their ability to provide sufficient amino acids to consumers. Extraction methods that can separate protein from anti-nutritional factors have potential to increase the nutritional value of this biomass. Few studies concerning analysis of the amino acid content of plant protein extracts exist. In this work, three different protein extraction methods were used to generate protein extracts from Buckwheat, Spelt and the red seaweed Chondrus crispus. Methods used include ultra-sonication in water combined with ammonium sulphate-induced protein precipitation; an enzymatic extraction method using the enzymes Alcalase and Viscozyme, and an iso-electric precipitation extraction method using alkaline protein solubilization followed by acidic protein precipitation. Proteins extracted using the enzymatic method contained the highest proportion of essential amino acids (EAA) in viable quantities, and the method holds promise for use in the generation of alternative marine and cereal protein extracts for human consumption.

Identifiers

PMID40993105
PMCPMC12460845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.