Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40992789›Full record

ArticleRMD open2025

Development and validation of LUPIN: a patient-centred self-administered tool to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Marc Scherlinger, Jean-Francois Kleinmann, Antonin Folliasson, Marianne Riviere, Sabine Malivoir, Raphaelle Rybak, Jean Sibilia, Zahir Amoura, Investigators (n=46)

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marc Scherlinger *Rheumatology Department, National Reference Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France marc.scherlinger@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-5895
Jean-Francois Kleinmann *Rheumatology Department, National Reference Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-7883
Antonin FolliassonHometrix Health, Paris, France.
Marianne RiviereAssociation France lupus Et autres maladies auto-immunes (AFL+), Metz, France.
Sabine MalivoirNational Reference Center for Lupus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Internal Medicine Department and Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Raphaelle RybakAssociation France lupus Et autres maladies auto-immunes (AFL+), Metz, France.
Jean Sibilia *Rheumatology Department, National Reference Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Zahir Amoura *National Reference Center for Lupus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Internal Medicine Department and Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Investigators (n=46)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate LUPIN, a self-administered, patient-centred questionnaire codesigned by patients and lupus specialists to assess disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

methodsLUPIN and the SF-36 questionnaires were distributed across 34 centres in both metropolitan France and overseas territories. Patients completed the questionnaire prior to their consultations. Physicians, blinded to patients' responses, assessed disease activity using SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Physician Global Assessment (PhGA). Correlations and discordances between patient and physician assessments were analysed.

resultsAmong 444 participants (85% women, mean age 45 years), the most common manifestations included joint (86%) and skin (72%) involvement; 35% had a history of lupus nephritis. While correlations between LUPIN scores and SLEDAI/PhGA were statistically significant but modest (r<0.39), stronger associations were observed with SF-36 domains for fatigue (r=0.65), pain (r=0.65), and physical function (r=0.69). In patients with active SLE (SLEDAI≥4; n=153), the correlation between LUPIN and clinical SLEDAI improved (r=0.53, p<0.0001). Discordances were primarily driven by patient-reported fatigue and pain, unrelated to suspected mechanical or central pain syndromes.

conclusionLUPIN effectively captures symptom domains that are often under-represented in conventional clinical indices and reflects the lived burden of disease in SLE. It offers a practical, scalable tool to support patient engagement, shared decision-making and individualised disease monitoring. A longitudinal digital study is underway to further assess its value in tracking disease fluctuations over time.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHealth-Related Quality Of LifeLupus Erythematosus, SystemicOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID40992789
PMCPMC12458825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.