ArticleYonsei medical journal2025
Foveal Serous Retinal Detachment with Inferior Staphyloma: Long-Term Treatment Response to Anti-VEGF and Photodynamic Therapy.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the treatment response and long-term prognosis of foveal serous retinal detachment (SRD) associated with inferior staphyloma to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment and photodynamic therapy (PDT). MATERIALS AND
methodsTreatment-naïve patients who underwent >24 months of follow-up were included. We analyzed inter-visit changes in the foveal subretinal fluid (SRF) height after anti-VEGF treatment or PDT compared to no treatment and long-term prognosis of best-corrected visual acuity in choroidal neovascularization (CNV)-free patients.
resultsNineteen patients were enrolled, and the mean follow-up duration was 4.81 years. In 14 CNV-free patients, 11 received anti-VEGF injections, three patients underwent PDT, and two patients had both treatments. During the follow-up period, there were a total of 243 inter-visit events (88 injections and 155 observations without treatment). At the last visit of patients who received the treatment, complete resolution was more significantly achieved in the CNV group than in the CNV-free group (
conclusionTreatment with anti-VEGF and PDT do not seem to be effective for foveal SRD of CNV-free inferior staphyloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.