Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40992766›Full record

Trial reportYonsei medical journal2025

Impact of Adherence to Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Effectiveness.

Suonaa Lee, Kyung Mee Park, Do Hyun Lee, Eun Chae Choi, Yujin Lee, Eun Lee

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05809544 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blinded, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

TypeinterventionalSponsorWELT corpRan2022 to 2023Enrolled68ConditionsInsomniaArmsWELT-IP, Sham
NCT05822999 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

TypeinterventionalSponsorWELT corpRan2021 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsInsomniaArmsWELT-IP, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suonaa LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1801-3267
Kyung Mee ParkThe Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2416-2683
Do Hyun LeeDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9940-1588
Eun Chae ChoiThe Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8935-6201
Yujin LeeWELT Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1844-6213
Eun LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-0144

Funding

Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation B0081115000708Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2023-00266002Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2023-00266398National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1A2B5B03002611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) offers a promising solution to the accessibility limitations of traditional face-to-face CBT-I, few studies have examined dCBT-I against a sham app and adherence issues remain. This study assessed the efficacy of dCBT-I compared with a sham app and investigated whether adherence predicts sleep outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this combined analysis of two multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized controlled trials, 120 patients with insomnia were randomized to use the dCBT-I app (n=60) or a sham app (n=60). The primary outcome was the change in sleep efficiency (SE) from baseline after the 6-week intervention. The relationship between adherence to sleep restriction therapy (SRT) and sleep outcomes post-intervention was assessed.

resultsAfter adjusting for age, sex, sleep medication use, and baseline levels of each outcome variable, the dCBT-I group demonstrated better treatment outcomes than the sham app group, with significant improvements of 7.69% in SE [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.09% to 12.30%;

conclusionThis combined analysis demonstrates the efficacy of dCBT-I in improving sleep outcomes compared with a sham app and highlights the role of adherence to SRT in enhancing treatment efficacy. The two studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05822999, NCT05809544).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPatient ComplianceSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleepTreatment OutcomeAdherencecognitive behavioral therapydigital therapeuticsinsomnia

Identifiers

PMID40992766
PMCPMC12479198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.