ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2026
The association of place-based disadvantage and access to deceased donor heart transplantation.
Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
US heart transplant candidates from socioeconomically disadvantaged communities have lower access to transplants. The place-based disadvantage index that best captures this disparity is still unknown. We sought to answer this question. We studied all adult heart transplant candidates initially listed between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We used competing risk regressions to estimate the association of 4 place-based disadvantage indices (social vulnerability metric, social vulnerability index, area deprivation index [ADI], and distressed communities index) with transplantation and death using models adjusted for characteristics that impact access to transplantation. ADI was significantly associated with receiving a transplant over the greatest range of deciles compared with other indices. Three years after listing, ADI decile 1 patients had a cumulative incidence of 83% of receiving a transplant, compared with 65.8% of decile 10 candidates. Compared with decile 1, decile 10 patients had a 156% greater risk of dying on the waitlist. In this study, we found that ADI was associated with transplantation to a greater extent than other indices studied. The forthcoming continuous distribution provides an opportunity to incorporate ADI to address disparities in heart transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.