Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40992539›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2025

Nucleation feedback can drive establishment and maintenance of biased microtubule polarity in neurites.

Hannah G Scanlon, Gibarni Mahata, Anna C Nelson, Scott A McKinley, Melissa M Rolls, Maria-Veronica Ciocanel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah G ScanlonDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, 27710, NC, USA.
Gibarni MahataDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802, PA, USA.
Anna C NelsonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 87131, NM, USA.
Scott A McKinleyDepartment of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, 70118, LA, USA.
Melissa M RollsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802, PA, USA.
Maria-Veronica CiocanelDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, 27710, NC, USA; Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, 27710, NC, USA. Electronic address: veronica.ciocanel@duke.edu.

Funding

UNM FIRST: Promoting Inclusive Excellence in Neuroscience and Data Science - Administrative Supplement to support FIRST Faculty TravelU54CA272167 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2022 to 2026
$20.4M
Pairing Modeling and Experiment to Understand Microtubule Behavior in Healthy and Injured NeuronsR01NS121245 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Maria-Veronica Ciocanel, Scott A McKinley · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA272167NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microtubule cytoskeleton is comprised of dynamic, polarized filaments that facilitate transport within the cell. Polarized microtubule arrays are key to facilitating cargo transport in long cells such as neurons. Microtubules also undergo dynamic instability, where the plus and minus ends of the filaments switch between growth and shrinking phases, leading to frequent microtubule turnover. Although microtubules often completely disassemble and new filaments nucleate, microtubule arrays have been observed to both maintain their biased orientation throughout the cell lifetime and to rearrange their polarity as an adaptive response to injury. Motivated by cytoskeleton organization in neurites, we propose a spatially-explicit stochastic model of microtubule arrays and investigate how nucleation of new filaments could generate biased polarity in a simple linear domain. Using a continuous-time Markov chain model of microtubule growth dynamics, we model and parameterize two experimentally-validated nucleation mechanisms: nucleation feedback, where the direction of filament growth depends on existing microtubule content, and a checkpoint mechanism, where microtubules that nucleate in a direction opposite to the majority experience frequent catastrophe. When incorporating these validated mechanisms into the spatial model, we find that nucleation feedback is sufficient to establish biased polarity in neurites of different lengths, and that the emergence and maintenance of biased polarity is relatively stable in spite of stochastic fluctuations. This work provides a framework to study the relationship between microtubule nucleation and polarity, and could extend to give insights into mechanisms that drive the formation of polarized filament arrays in other biological settings.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalNeuritesAnimalsMarkov ChainsStochastic ProcessesMicrotubule turnoverNucleation feedbackParameterizationStochastic simulation

Identifiers

PMID40992539
PMCPMC12662192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.