Observational studyJournal of radiation research2025
Toxicity and patient-reported outcomes after moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy in 20 fractions) for prostate cancer: prospective observational study.
Observational study in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Contemporary Image Guided Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results From the Prospective PRO-Cube Study.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Relationship between rectal bleeding and radiation delivery time in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a preliminary study.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated toxicity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy, focusing on clinically meaningful deterioration assessed using the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at 24 months. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 58 patients were prospectively enrolled at a single institution and received volumetric-modulated arc therapy and image-guided radiotherapy, delivering 60 Gy in 20 fractions. The median follow-up period was 48 months. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) was assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months using the Short Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities occurred in 0% and 5.2% of patients, respectively. Late Grade 2 GI and GU toxicities occurred in 1.7% and 6.9% of patients, respectively. No Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were reported. At 24 months, a ≥ 2 × MCID decline in SF-8 physical and mental component scores was observed in 12.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-21.2%) and 14.3% (95% CI: 4.5-24.1%), respectively. In the EPIC domains, ≥ 2 × MCID declines occurred in 23.8% (95% CI: 10.9-36.7%) for bowel and 8.5% (95% CI: 0.5-16.5%) for urinary summary scores. A 60 Gy regimen delivered in 20 fractions is feasible and well tolerated, with low toxicity and stable HR-QOL, although these preliminary findings are based on a limited observation period and sample size. Longer follow-up and larger studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.