ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
The Indian Ocean slave trade and colonial expansion resulted in strong sex-biased admixture in South Africa.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The colonial-period arrival of Europeans in southern Africa is associated with strong sex-biased migration by which male settlers displaced Indigenous Khoekhoe and San men. Concurrently, the importation of enslaved individuals from South Asia, Indonesia, and eastern Africa likely contributed to female-biased migration. Using genetic data from over 1,400 individuals, we examine the spatial and temporal spread of sex-biased migration from the Cape to the northern edges of the historic colonial frontier. In all regions, admixture patterns were sex biased, with evidence of a greater male contribution of European ancestry and greater female contribution of Khoe-San ancestry. While admixture among Khoe-San, European, equatorial African, and Asian groups has likely been continuous from the founding of Cape Town to the present day, we find that Khoe-San groups further north experienced a single pulse of European admixture 6-8 generations ago. European admixture was followed by additional Khoe-San gene flow, potentially reflecting an aggregation of Indigenous groups due to disruption by colonial interlopers. Male migration into the northern frontier territories was not a homogenous group of expanding Afrikaners and slaves. The Nama exhibit distinct founder effects and derive 15% of their Y chromosome haplogroups from Asian lineages, a pattern absent in the ≠Khomani San. Khoe-San ancestry from the paternal line is greatly diminished in populations from Cape Town, the Cederberg Mountains, and Upington but remains more frequent in self-identified Indigenous ethnic groups. Strikingly, we estimate that Khoe-San Y chromosomes were experiencing unprecedented population growth at the time of European arrival. Our findings shed light on the patterns of admixture and population history of South Africa as the colonial frontier expanded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.