ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2026
Extracting language information from clinical notes using large language models.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient language proficiency plays a critical role in equitable, patient-centered care and language-related clinical research. However, language information recorded in structured fields of electronic health records (EHRs) is often incomplete or inaccurate, especially in multi-institutional settings with heterogeneous documentation practices.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate a named entity recognition (NER) pipeline that accurately extracts detailed patient language status from unstructured clinical notes using large language models (LLMs), thereby enabling scalable and generalizable language information extraction.
methodsWe defined four categories of language status-fluent use, partial ability, lack of understanding, and language mentions unrelated to the patient-and annotated two datasets from Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH) and MIMIC-III. We evaluated the performance of proprietary and open-source LLMs, including GPT-4o, LLaMA3, and BERT, under zero-shot and fine-tuning settings. Cross-site validation was conducted to assess generalizability across institutions.
resultsGPT-4o achieved F1 scores of 87 % and 82 % on YNHH and MIMIC datasets, respectively, without fine-tuning. Fine-tuned open-source models such as BERT and LLaMA3 reached comparable or superior performance when trained on sufficient annotated data. Cross-institutional evaluations confirmed that LLMs, particularly LLaMA3, exhibited stronger generalizability than traditional models. Language mentions unrelated to patient fluency remained the most challenging category across all models.
conclusionOur NER framework enables automated extraction of nuanced language information from clinical narratives with high accuracy and generalizability. This work supports large-scale, language-focused research and has practical implications for improving patient-provider communication, interpreter service allocation, and equitable healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.