ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Sex workers' engagement with mutual aid on-the-ground and online: Exploring access to grassroots support networks among a community-based cohort in Vancouver, Canada (2020-2024).
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of "digital" and "on-the-ground" (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020-24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing "on-the-ground" mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.