ArticleRehabilitation psychology2026
The Internalized Ableism Inventory: Scale development using a hybrid artificial intelligence and community-based participatory research design.
Article in Rehabilitation psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative psychometrics via AI-GENIE: Automatic item generation and validation with network-integrated evaluation.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Ageism, ableism, and their associated factors among international undergraduate medical students in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study (a) used OpenAI's GPT-4 large language model to generate an initial item pool for a potential scale measuring internalized ableism, (b) involved disabled community stakeholders in refining the items and prompting additional artificial intelligence-generated items, and (c) psychometrically validated the scale in a large sample of disabled individuals.
methodFollowing a series of GPT-4 prompts and iterative community-based participatory research feedback, a tentative item pool of 90 statements was developed. A sample of 409 adults with diverse disabilities completed a survey containing the initial item pool, potentially related scales, and demographic questions.
resultsAn exploratory factor analysis helped identify the final 51 items and subscale structure, and a confirmatory factor analysis then provided evidence of excellent factor structure fit. The scale contained eight subscales with Cronbach's αs that ranged from .85 to .97, with an overall total score α of .98. The total score and subscales showed consistent convergent validity with other measures of internalized stigma for chronic illness and anger and frustration with disability.
conclusionThis study generated for the first time in the known research literature a nuanced, comprehensive, and psychometrically sound scale based on the integration of both artificial intelligence and community-based participatory research methodology: the Internalized Ableism Inventory. The demonstrated methodology generating it has the potential to modernize psychological scale development approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.