Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991691›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Technological complexity and combinatorial invention in small-scale societies.

Marcus J Hamilton, José Lobo, Mark Collard, Robert S Walker, Briggs Buchanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcus J HamiltonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1754-6969
José LoboSchool of Sustainability, College of Global Futures, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-7168
Mark CollardLaboratory of Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2725-4989
Robert S WalkerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8643-7726
Briggs BuchananDepartment of Anthropology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-9615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology plays a central role in all human societies, from foraging to industrial economies. However, technological solutions come with associated costs, and in small-scale societies, technological complexity reflects this trade-off between efficiency and resource constraints. Here, we analyze this trade-off and show a sublinear scaling relationship between toolkit richness and tool part richness in ethnographic societies. This result indicates diminishing returns where each additional part contributes less to overall toolkit diversity. This scaling holds across diverse ecological and cultural contexts, suggesting a general principle of optimization in tool design. Ethnographic toolkits achieve their adaptability by reusing a core set of versatile parts and selectively incorporating more specialized parts. However, increasing richness also increases complexity, and complexity is costly. We formalize these dynamics within a combinatorial optimization framework and discuss the implications.

Indexed as

InventionsTechnologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40991691
PMCPMC12459400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.