ArticlePloS one2025
Understanding and mitigating the impact of ambient mRNA contamination in single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial transcript abundance in breast cancer circulating tumour cells may reflect both blood-derived transcripts and biological heterogeneity.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Article
- Empirical Estimation of Ambient Contamination in Combinatorial Single-Cell Methods Using Multi-Reference Mapping.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking computational decontamination of ambient RNA.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Extra-nasal odorant receptors: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) frequently encounters significant challenges from contamination of cell-free mRNAs, known as "ambient mRNAs", which can substantially distort single-cell transcriptome data interpretation to a large extent. In this study, we investigate the impact of ambient mRNA contamination on differential gene expression and biological pathway enrichment analyses, using two independent scRNA-seq datasets: ten peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) samples from dengue-infected patients and forty-two scRNA-seq samples of human fetal liver tissues. We apply two independent ambient mRNA correction approaches - CellBender (automate correction) and SoupX (using a predefined set of potential ambient mRNA genes). We demonstrate that ambient mRNA transcripts appear among differentially expressed genes (DEGs), subsequently leading to the identification of significant ambient-related biological pathways in unexpected cell subpopulations before ambient mRNA contamination correction. In contrast, after suitable correction, we observe a reduction in ambient mRNA expression levels, resulting in improved DEG identification and leading to the highlight of biologically relevant pathways specific to cell subpopulations. Our study underscores the importance of understanding and applying appropriate corrections for ambient mRNA contamination to enhance the reliability and accuracy of scRNA-seq data analyses, thereby improving the robustness of data interpretation in droplet-based scRNA-seq datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.