Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991638›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Government environmental attention and urban ecosystems metabolic efficiency: Does the digital economy matter.

Xiangmin He, Shenrun Yan, Jingyun Miao, Weilin Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiangmin HeSchool of Economics and Trade, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9251-0704
Shenrun YanSchool of Business Administration, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China.
Jingyun MiaoSchool of Business Administration, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China.
Weilin ZengSchool of Economics and Trade, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic efficiency serves as a critical indicator of the operational quality of urban ecosystems. This study utilizes panel data from Chinese cities and applies the spatial Durbin model to examine the impact of government environmental attention (GEA) on the metabolic efficiency of urban ecosystems (UME). The findings indicate that GEA significantly promotes UME and exhibits spatial spillover effects. Moreover, GEA demonstrates notable heterogeneity in its influence on UME. Specifically, it exerts a more pronounced improvement effect in mid-sized and western cities, resource-based cities, and cities with relatively lower levels of economic development. Using the dynamic panel threshold regression model, this study further reveals that GEA has a significant nonlinear impact on UME, with digital economy development serving as the threshold variable. Once the level of digital economy development surpasses the threshold, the role of GEA becomes even more prominent. This research provides valuable decision-making references for developing countries aiming to promote the sustainable development of cities.

Indexed as

EcosystemGovernmentChinaCitiesConservation of Natural ResourcesEconomic DevelopmentHumansSustainable Development

Identifiers

PMID40991638
PMCPMC12459852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.