ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Detection of pneumonia in children through chest radiographs using artificial intelligence in a low-resource setting: A pilot study.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Imaging: A Primer for Pediatric Clinicians.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: A Narrative Review of Deep Learning Methods, Clinical Utility, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis of global output, networks, and frontiers [2016-2025].Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- AI-driven diagnosis of pneumococcal infections in children-a call for primary-care focused and a coherent evidence base.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Strengthening ethics review of the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in health research: a guide for research ethics committees in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumonia is a leading cause of death among children under 5 years in low-and-middle-income-countries (LMICs), causing an estimated 700,000 deaths annually. This burden is compounded by limited diagnostic imaging expertise. Artificial intelligence (AI) has potential to improve pneumonia diagnosis from chest radiographs (CXRs) through enhanced accuracy and faster diagnostic time. However, most AI models lack validation on prospective clinical data from LMICs, limiting their real-world applicability. This study aims to develop and validate an AI model for childhood pneumonia detection using Nigerian CXR data. In a multi-center cross-sectional study in Ibadan, Nigeria, CXRs were prospectively collected from University College Hospital (a tertiary hospital) and Rainbow-Scans (a private diagnostic center) radiology departments via cluster sampling (November 2023-August 2024). An AI model was developed on open-source paediatric CXR dataset from the USA, to classify the local prospective CXRs as either normal or pneumonia. Two blinded radiologists provided consensus classification as the reference standard. The model's accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were evaluated. The AI model was developed on 5,232 open-source paediatric CXRs, divided into training (1,349 normal, 3,883 pneumonia) and internal test (234 normal, 390 pneumonia) sets, and externally tested on 190 radiologist-labeled Nigerian CXRs (93 normal, 97 pneumonia). The model achieved 86% accuracy, 0.83 precision, 0.98 recall, 0.79 F1-score, and 0.93 AUC on the internal test, and 58% accuracy, 0.62 precision, 0.48 recall, 0.68 F1-score, and 0.65 AUC on the external test. This study illustrates AI's potential for childhood pneumonia diagnosis but reveals challenges when applied across diverse healthcare environments, as revealed by discrepancies between internal and external evaluations. This performance gap likely stems from differences in imaging protocols/equipment between LMICs and high-income settings. Hence, public health priority should be developing robust, locally relevant datasets in Africa to facilitate sustainable and independent AI development within African healthcare.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.