Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991619›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Fatigue and neuromuscular function in long COVID: A one-year follow-up study.

Isabella da Silva Almeida, Leandro Gomes de Jesus Ferreira, Marco Aurélio Vaz, Gerson Cipriano Junior, Monique Alves de Resende, Denis Cesar Leite Vieira, Rochelle Rocha Costa, Nicolas Babault, Rita de Cássia Marqueti, João Luiz Quagliotti Durigan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04961255 (Effects of Post-COVID-19 on Neural Activation and Architecture of the Quadriceps Femoral Muscle-tendon Unit and Its Correlation With Inflammatory Markers), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04961255 unknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Post-COVID-19 on Neural Activation and Architecture of the Quadriceps Femoral Muscle-tendon Unit and Its Correlation With Inflammatory Markers

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BrasiliaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsPost-COVID-19, Healthy Participants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabella da Silva AlmeidaLaboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-2800
Leandro Gomes de Jesus FerreiraLaboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio VazExercise Research Laboratory, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Gerson Cipriano JuniorGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Rehabilitation Science Department, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Monique Alves de ResendeLaboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Denis Cesar Leite VieiraStrength and Conditioning Research Laboratory, College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-1846
Rochelle Rocha CostaGraduate Program in Physical Education, Physical Education Department, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-4936
Nicolas BabaultCentre d'Expertise de la Performance, INSERM U1093 CAPS, Sports Science Faculty, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6563-503X
Rita de Cássia MarquetiLaboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
João Luiz Quagliotti DuriganLaboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-5289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong COVID has emerged as a significant complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the long-term neuromuscular consequences of this condition, particularly one-year post-infection, remain poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the mechanisms of fatigue by comparing perceived fatigue, objective fatigability, functionality, muscle architecture, and electrical neuromuscular function in participants who had suffered severe or moderate COVID‑19 one-year post-infection with a healthy control group. METHODS AND

findingsThis longitudinal observational study followed participants for one-year. The assessments were conducted at the Laboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity at the University of Brasília, Brazil. Participants who had suffered moderate or severe SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared to a control group. A baseline assessment was initially conducted (21-30 days post-symptoms onset or post-hospital discharge), followed by second (31-90), third (91-180), and fourth (181-360) assessments. Perceived fatigue, objective fatigability, functionality, muscle architecture, and electrical neuromuscular function were analyzed. The study included 30 controls (46.53 [42.10-51.43] years; 13 men [43.33%]), 22 moderate cases (38.27 [33.96-43.13] years; 10 men [45.45%]), and 18 severe cases (50.83 [45.19-57.18] years; eight men [44.44%]). Severe participants exhibited higher perceived fatigue in all assessments than the control group and at baseline and in assessment 4 compared to moderate cases, in addition to a lower torque and torque-time integral in all assessments of objective fatigability analysis compared to the other groups. The severe group also demonstrated reduced functionality, impaired muscle architecture (characterized by increased echogenicity), and higher chronaxie values in the electrical neuromuscular function assessment. Participants with moderate COVID‑19 exhibited alterations in perceived fatigue, reduced torque, and lower TTI, electrical neuromuscular function, and muscle architecture, particularly at baseline.

conclusionsSevere participants continued to experience significant perceived fatigue even one-year post-infection, suggesting a slower recovery trajectory, that contributed to increased fatigability throughout the follow-up period. These results emphasize the role of musculoskeletal and neural mechanisms in post-COVID‑19 fatigue, highlighting the need for targeted, mechanism-based rehabilitation strategies.

trial registrationNCT04961255.

Indexed as

COVID-19FatigueAdultBrazilFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40991619
PMCPMC12459844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.