Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40991586›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Effects of different lower limb movement velocities on trunk muscle activity and dynamic stability in the Sahrmann core stability test.

Kohei Yoshikawa, Matsuri Hashimoto, Rina Murata, Yuta Murata, Takumi Jiroumaru, Noriyuki Kida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kohei YoshikawaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kanazawa Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Clinic, Ritto, Shiga, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5758-3926
Matsuri HashimotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kanazawa Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Clinic, Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
Rina MurataDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kanazawa Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Clinic, Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
Yuta MurataGraduate School of Science and Technology, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takumi JiroumaruDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, Bukkyo University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Noriyuki KidaFaculty of Arts and Sciences, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7669-6719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core stability is essential for both performance and rehabilitation, yet standardized movement velocity criteria for the Sahrmann Core Stability Test (SCST) remain undefined. This study aimed to analyze how lower limb movement velocity affects trunk muscle activation patterns across movement phases and sides during SCST Level 3 in a supine position. SCST Level 3 was selected because it challenges both deep and superficial muscles without being too difficult for healthy participants. Sixteen healthy adult males, recreationally active but not involved in a training program at the time of recruitment, performed leg-lowering movements at three velocities: slow (5 s), medium (3 s), and fast (1 s). Surface electromyography recorded activation in the internal oblique/transversus abdominis (IO/TrA), external oblique (EO), and rectus abdominis (RA). Dynamic stability was simultaneously monitored using an inflatable pressure-biofeedback unit positioned at L4-L5 and inflated to 40 mmHg; participants maintained the pressure within ±10 mmHg throughout each trial. Muscle activity was analyzed across five phases: 500 ms and 250 ms before movement (pre-500 ms, pre-250 ms), and three post-movement phases (post 1, post 2, post 3). A three-way repeated-measures ANOVA (factors: velocity, movement phase, and laterality) revealed significant velocity-phase interactions for all muscles (p < 0.05; IO/TrA: η2 = 0.170; EO: η2 = 0.198; RA: η2 = 0.153), indicating that velocity affected the temporal activation pattern, particularly during the middle phase of the movement. Faster movements led to a rapid increase in IO/TrA, EO, and RA activity at post 2, whereas slower movements showed a gradual increase. Activation levels converged across conditions by the final phase, with no significant differences between deep and superficial muscles or between sides. These findings suggest SCST Level 3 consistently elicits high trunk muscle activation regardless of velocity. However, faster movements may provide valuable insights into trunk stabilization during mid-movement for clinical evaluations.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityMuscle, SkeletalTorsoAdultElectromyographyHumansMaleMovementPostural BalanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40991586
PMCPMC12459807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.